Cases 11 - 20 of 353
Patterson
as 1:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PATTERSON v. WILKES
as 5:2023cv00267
Petitioner:
DANIEL RAY PATTERSON
Defendant:
WARDEN SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nagipejutawin et al v. Roberson et al
as 4:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
Nagipejutawin, Julia Catherine Stanley, Linda Simmons and others
Respondent:
Roberson, Sparks and Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Emmons et al
as 4:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bennett
Defendant:
Shawn Emmons, Joshua Jones and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moses v. Odum
as 4:2023cv00110
Petitioner:
Antonio Leon Moses
Respondent:
Ray Odum
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moses v. Odum
as 5:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
Antonio Leon Moses
Respondent:
Ray Odum
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Emmons et al
as 4:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bennett
Defendant:
Warden Shawn Emmons, Joshua Jones and Jeffery Balled
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Engle v. Henry County Sheriff et al
as 1:2023cv01543
Plaintiff:
Shane Ray Engle
Defendant:
Henry County Sheriff, Henry County Jail, Iowa Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DICKERSON v. WARDEN et al
as 4:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RAY DICKERSON
Defendant:
WARDEN, Officer Wright and Sam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMAS v. RAY
as 5:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
AMADO BECERRA LOMAS
Respondent:
WARDEN HEATHER RAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
