Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Sanchez v. Davis
as 6:2018cv00160
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Davis
as 6:2018cv00159
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Davis et al
as 6:2017cv00340
Defendant:
Ms FNU Comstock, Doris Davis, Carol Del and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricardo Sanchez v. Lorie Davi
as 17-20691
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICARDO ENRIQUEZ SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
STAFF OFFICER PITTMAN
Ricardo Sanchez v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-50166
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO ENRIQUEZ SANCHEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ricardo Sanchez v. George Allen, et al
as 17-50172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICARDO ENRIQUEZ SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
HONORABLE GEORGE ALLEN, 54th and 19th District Judge McLennan County, MICHELLE VOIRIN, Assistant District Attorney McLennan County, PHIL MARTINEZ, Attorney at Law and others
Sanchez v. Davis
as 4:2016cv02688
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez
Defendant:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricardo Sanchez v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-51071
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO ENRIQUEZ SANCHEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Enriquez Sanchez v. Davis et al
as 4:2016cv02356
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, James L Jones and (fnu) Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Stephens
as 6:2016cv00296
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
