Cases 11 - 20 of 160
Fields v. Robinson
as 1:2023cv01340
Petitioner:
David Fields
Respondent:
Warden Norm Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Henderson et al
as 3:2023cv00089
Petitioner:
Martin Robinson
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Henderson, ODRC Director Annette Chamber Smith, Ohio Attorney Genera Mike Dewine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
as 2:2023cv00089
Petitioner:
Sterling Robinson
Respondent:
Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Croskey v. Robinson et al
as 1:2022cv01989
Plaintiff:
Antonio Garnell Croskey
Defendant:
Judge Brent Robinson and State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Robinson v. City of Sandusky, Ohio et al
as 3:2022cv01457
Plaintiff:
Gerald V. Robinson
Defendant:
City of Sandusky, Ohio, Officer John Powell, Officer Carissa Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry v. May et al
as 3:2022cv00688
Plaintiff:
Marquez B. Perry
Defendant:
Warden Harold May, DWO Hobbs, Major Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Taylor v. Tornichio et al
as 3:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Pierre Rahsaan Taylor
Defendant:
Adolfo Tornichio, Stephen Wolaver, Alan Kraker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGowan v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Andrew McGowan
Defendant:
Ronald Erdos, Mr. Cadogen, Cynthia Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parham v. Robinson
as 2:2021cv05725
Petitioner:
Clemon D Parham
Respondent:
Warden Norm Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hunter v. May et al
as 3:2021cv02247
Plaintiff:
Joseph R Hunter, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Harold May, DWO Mr. Watters, Major Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
