Cases 11 - 20 of 432
Murillo v. CDCR et al
as 3:2023cv04450
Plaintiff:
Mona Salcida Murillo
Defendant:
CDCR, M. B. Atchley, Johnthich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaime Montalvo Ruiz v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv06792
Petitioner:
Jaime Montalvo Ruiz
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Harris v. Phillips, et al.
as 1:2023cv01054
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Defendant:
Byan Phillips, M Gallegos, S Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Harris v. Phillips, et al.
as 1:2023cv01051
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Defendant:
Byan D. Phillips, T. A. Ruiz and C. M. Lata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Phillips et al.
as 4:2023cv03397
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Defendant:
Byan Phillips, M Gallegos, S Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Phillips et al
as 4:2023cv03261
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Defendant:
Byan D Phillips, T A Ruiz, C M Lata and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Ruiz-Palacios v. FCI Mendota Warden
as 1:2023cv00945
Petitioner:
Juan C. Ruiz-Palacios
Respondent:
FCI Mendota Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ahadi Abu-Al Muhammad v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2023cv01260
Plaintiff:
Ahadi Abu-Al Muhammad and Onofre Serrano
Defendant:
County of Riverside, City of Riverside Police Department, M. Rardin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Kings County et al
as 1:2023at00517
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Harper
Defendant:
Kings County, David Robinson and J. Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Kings County, et al.
as 1:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Harper
Defendant:
Kings County, David Robinson and J. Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
