Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Bartlett v. Massachusetts Parole Board et al
as 1:2013cv11479
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Bartlett
Defendant:
Massachusetts Parole Board, Josh Wall, Cesar Archilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Ashe
as 3:2013cv30055
Petitioner:
Richard Rogers
Respondent:
Michael Ashe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Ashe et al
as 3:2012cv30188
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers
Defendant:
Michael Ashe and Marirosa Lamas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wittkowski v. Spencer et al
as 1:2012cv10115
Plaintiff:
JoJo Wittkowski
Defendant:
Luis Spencer, Gary Roden, Robert B Diener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis et al v. Terestre et al
as 1:2011cv10711
Plaintiff:
Tanya Lewis, Joel Clay and Jurett Weathers
Defendant:
Albert Terestre, Daniel Adams, Alfredo Andres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rua v. Glodis et al
as 4:2010cv40251
Plaintiff:
Edwin Rua
Defendant:
Guy W. Glodis, Un-Named Deputies, Kathy Wisniewski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baggett v. Sturges et al
as 1:2010cv11896
Plaintiff:
Michael Stephen Baggett
Defendant:
Janet Sturges, Gregory Nyman, Deval L. Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Massachusetts Parole Board et al
as 4:2010cv40085
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Phillips
Defendant:
Massachusetts Parole Board, Mark A. Conrad, Roger Michel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battista v. Murphy et al
as 1:2009cv11406
Petitioner:
Sandy J. Battista
Respondent:
Robert Murphy, David Brouillette, Roger Parent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Conley et al
as 1:2008cv11525
Plaintiff:
Timothy Smith
Defendant:
Daniel F. Conley, Joseph M. Ditkoff, Alix O'Connell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
