Cases 11 - 20 of 119
SOUTH v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2017cv13387
Plaintiff:
JEREMY D. SOUTH
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTOPHER S. PORRINO, GARY M. LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv05175
Plaintiff:
DEBRA L ROGERS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv04845
Plaintiff:
RONNIE RAY ROGERS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COPLON v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv09496
Plaintiff:
ROGER JR. COPLON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. NORWOOD et al
as 1:2016cv04168
Plaintiff:
ROGER WHITE
Defendant:
NORWOOD, LAZURUS, GILLISPIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POYCE v. GREEN
as 2:2016cv00349
Petitioner:
ROGER CARDELLA POYCE
Respondent:
CHARLES GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROGERS v. NJDOC et al
as 1:2015cv07005
Plaintiff:
MARTIN LUTHER ROGERS
Defendant:
NJDOC, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL & CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, ROBERT BUECHELE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALMANZAR v. HOLLINGSWORTH et al
as 1:2015cv06244
Petitioner:
ROGER JOSE ALMANZAR
Respondent:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH and FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ARMSTRONG v. MAILINGS UNLIMITED et al
as 1:2015cv05739
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
MAILINGS UNLIMITED, CHRISTOPHER BREEN, JON K. WEBEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMACHO v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2015cv05571
Plaintiff:
CARLOS CAMACHO
Defendant:
RAFAEL ORTIZ, SGT. JOSEPH WEBBER, DET. CARLOS SILVA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
