Cases 11 - 20 of 113
Romero v. Jefferson County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv01602
Plaintiff:
Richard Romero
Defendant:
Jefferson County Jail, F. Gallegos-Cervantes and Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. USA
as 1:2022cv01498
Petitioner:
Dominick Romero
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Romero v. Mumley et al
as 1:2022cv01099
Plaintiff:
Richard Romero
Defendant:
Lindsay Mumley, Miranda Luster, Chaz Meihercik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Wellpath et al
as 1:2022cv00923
Plaintiff:
Richard Romero
Defendant:
Wellpath, John Archer, Bertngolis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Jefferson County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Richard Romero
Defendant:
Jefferson County Jail, F. Gallegos-Cervantes and Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Regeanborn et al
as 1:2021cv01120
Defendant:
Matthew Gillespie, Adams County Sheriff's Dept., Shipley and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Noel Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Nelson
as 1:2021cv00752
Defendant:
Scott Nelson
Plaintiff:
Alex Andrew Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fourstar et al v. Bidden et al
as 1:2021cv00414
Defendant:
Drew Weissman, Jessie Slaughter, Mitch McConnell and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr., Anthony Pacheco, Robert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertolo et al v. Long et al
as 1:2020cv02980
Plaintiff:
Raymond Martin, Benjamin Romero, Dennis Dunnan and others
Defendant:
Damian Mosley, Captain Cris Clare, Sterling Correctional Faciltiy Path Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Weld County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2020cv01981
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services Inc., Deputy Z. Poulsen, RN Katie Giroux and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
