Cases 11 - 20 of 131
Hughes-Canal v. Lewis and Clark County Public Defender's Office et al
as 6:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Hughes-Canal
Defendant:
Lewis and Clark County Public Defender's Office and Steven Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moorman v. State of Montana
as 4:2022cv00070
Petitioner:
Scott Edward Moorman
Respondent:
State of Montana, Lacy Lincoln and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Charlie v. Musk et al
as 9:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott Charlie
Defendant:
Elon Musk and Space X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wortman v. USA
as 1:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
Scott Allen Wortman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Warner v. Godfrey et al
as 6:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner
Defendant:
Demetric Godfrey, Jim Salmonsen, Lynn Guyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Rosenquist et al
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Daniels
Defendant:
Ingrid A Rosenquist, Scott Twito, April Huelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. USA
as 4:2021cv00129
Petitioner:
Susan Kaytlin Scott
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nickerson v. Montana State Prison et al
as 6:2021cv00080
Plaintiff:
Shane Phillip Nickerson
Defendant:
Montana State Prison, Montana D.O.C., Billie Reich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Garland et al
as 6:2021cv00058
Plaintiff:
Dale Richardson
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Brian Scott and Brian Beisemeyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chesmore v. CPS et al
as 1:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Scott D. Twito, Michael P. Sinks, Katie F. Schulz and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Dawn Chesmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
