Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Sanders v. Patterson Auto Smart
as 6:2014cv00798
Plaintiff:
Marvin D Sanders
Defendant:
Patterson Auto Smart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. Stephens et al
as 9:2014cv00092
Plaintiff:
Perry Smart
Defendant:
William Stephens, Charles W. Bell, Joseph Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Smart et al
as 4:2014cv00457
Petitioner:
Brian David Mitchell
Respondent:
Elizabeth Smart and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perry et al v. Stephens et al
as 9:2014cv00036
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Perry, Quincey Pillette, Perry Smart and others
Defendant:
William Stephens, Charles W. Bell, Joseph Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levingston v. Baker et al
as 6:2013cv00085
Defendant:
Warden I E. D. Baker, Warden I L. D. Berger, Lieutenant FNU Crowley and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alan Levingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smart v. Watkins
as 3:2013cv00632
Petitioner:
Perry Lewis Smart
Defendant:
Craig Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smart v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00477
Petitioner:
Michael C. Smart
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smart v. Bragg
as 3:2012cv00406
Respondent:
M. Travis Bragg
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Michael C. Smart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smart v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00348
Defendant:
Jose Carrillo, Clifford Cherry, Rene Fadoua and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Smart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smart v. Bragg
as 3:2012cv00275
Respondent:
Warden M. Travis Bragg
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Michael C. Smart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
