Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Kelly Koerner v. James Cox, et al
as 14-15159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELLY KOERNER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES GREG COX, PAMELA DELPORTO, Inspector General and STEVEN CLARK, Disciplinary Hearing Officer
Clark v. Royal et al
as 5:2013cv00087
Plaintiff:
Steven Clark
Defendant:
Randy Royal and Stapleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Clark v. Tommy Gregory, et al
as 12-10874
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
TOMMY GREGORY, LARRY HAMILTON, SR., a.k.a. Hamilton, JOSHUA BAKER, a.k.a. Baker and others
Steven Clark v. Tommy Gregory, et al
as 11-14724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
TOMMY GREGORY, Sheriff, LARRY HAMILTON, SR., a.k.a. Hamilton, JOSHUA BAKER, a.k.a. Baker and others
Clark et al v. Royal et al
as 5:2011cv00096
Plaintiff:
Steven Clark, Mark Pierce and Troy Williams
Defendant:
Randy Royal, Stapleton, Ryals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koerner v. Cox et al
as 3:2011cv00116
Defendant:
Steven Clark, James Greg Cox, Pamela Delporto and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Koerner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Clark v. Sheriff Tommy Gregory, et al
as 10-15395
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY GEORGE GREGORY, HAMILTON, Jail Administrator, BAKER, Assistant Jail Administrator and others
Brown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2010cv02101
Plaintiff:
Albert Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Alex Taylor, Jeffery Trovillion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Gregory et al
as 2:2009cv00164
Plaintiff:
Steven Clark
Defendant:
Tommy Gregory, Hamilton, Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Hollingsworth
as 3:2009cv00214
Petitioner:
Joseph Steven Clark
Respondent:
Lisa J.W. Hollingsworth
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
