Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Pressley v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01864
Plaintiff:
Andjoura Sagel Pressley
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulmore v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01863
Plaintiff:
Karla Denise Fulmore
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. General Food Stores of Walterboro Inc et al
as 2:2016cv01814
Plaintiff:
Dorothy May Ford
Defendant:
General Food Stores of Walterboro Inc and Walterboro Police Department, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00964
Plaintiff:
Robin Hayes
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latimore v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
as 2:2015cv04751
Plaintiff:
David Latimore, Jr
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc , Wal-Mart Associates Inc , Wal-Mart Stores East LP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. IGA Inc et al
as 6:2015cv01073
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
IGA Inc, BILO Stores Inc and Scamers of Billions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. Walmart et al
as 7:2014cv04884
Plaintiff:
Karahn Bonner
Defendant:
Walmart , Walmart Stores Inc , John Doe Corporation No 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Ingles Store 92 et al
as 7:2013cv01138
Plaintiff:
Terry Douglas Campbell
Defendant:
Ingles Store 92, Michael Christopher Folk, Travis Todd King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Stepheney v. Publixs Food Store Pharmacys et al
as 1:2011cv03402
Plaintiff:
Wade Stepheney, Jr
Defendant:
Publix's Food Store Pharmacys, SCDCs Director, Commissioners SSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches v. Frederick's of Hollywood Stores Inc et al
as 6:2008cv01423
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Frederick's of Hollywood Stores Inc and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
