Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Shelton v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv03050
Petitioner:
Joseph Kennard Shelton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ellis v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv09475
Plaintiff:
Anthony Malik Ellis
Defendant:
City of New York, Shelton, Absolom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv05749
Petitioner:
Joseph Kennard Shelton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collins v. Goodliff et al
as 6:2014cv06722
Plaintiff:
Larry J. Shelton Collins
Defendant:
Richard Goodliff, Andy Prebalick, Keith Maloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Goodliff et al
as 1:2014cv09252
Plaintiff:
Larry J. Shelton Collins
Defendant:
Richard Goodliff, Andy Prebalick, Keith Maloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dolce
as 9:2014cv00405
Petitioner:
Shelton C. Jones
Respondent:
Sandra Dolce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Beaman v. Obus et al
as 1:2013cv04394
Plaintiff:
Shelton R. Beaman
Defendant:
Michael Obus, Bruce Yelich and Correctional Facility - NYSDOCS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2013cv00929
Plaintiff:
Shelton C. Jones
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and Jane Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaman v. Fischer et al
as 9:2012cv01769
Plaintiff:
Shelton Beaman
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Joseph F. Belliner and Central Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beaman v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision ("DOCCS") et al
as 9:2012cv01770
Plaintiff:
Shelton Beaman
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision ("DOCCS"), Down State Correctional Facility Officials and Bare Hill Correctional Facility Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
