Cases 11 - 20 of 20
SHEPPARD v. POWELL et al
as 2:2016cv01091
Petitioner:
MARK C. SHEPPARD
Respondent:
JOHN POWELL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ADAMS et al v. MUNIAK et al
as 1:2013cv04523
Plaintiff:
QUINCELL ADAMS and RICHARD TORO
Defendant:
ROSELLEN G. MUNIAK, M. SHEPPARD and LT. "JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DRAKE v. MUNIAK et al
as 1:2013cv03868
Plaintiff:
KEITH HASSON DRAKE
Defendant:
ROSELLEN G. MUNIAK, SGT. M. SHEPPARD, "JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. CHRISTIE et al
as 1:2013cv03433
Plaintiff:
SHARROD KING
Defendant:
C. CHRISTIE, GARY LANIGAN, C. RAY HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWRENCE v. LANIGAN et al
as 1:2012cv00393
Plaintiff:
DERICK D. LAWRENCE
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, CHARLES WARREN, NORMA MORALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEPPARD v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2011cv02398
Plaintiff:
AARON SHEPPARD
Defendant:
JEFFREY ZAVIS , JOHN DOE (A-Z), JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE (1-2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOKES v. LANIGAN et al
as 1:2011cv00407
Plaintiff:
JACQUAR STOKES
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, SCO SHEPPARD, SCO JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KWANZAA v. MEE et al
as 2:2009cv05132
Plaintiff:
CHAKA KWANZAA
Defendant:
DONALD MEE, JR., PAUL, R. LAFORGIG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEPPARD v. BURKE et al
as 1:2008cv06271
Plaintiff:
TYRONE ERIC SHEPPARD
Defendant:
RICHARD BURKE, VINELAND NJ POLICE DEPT. and CUM. CONT. STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BOLLING v. HAYMAN et al
as 3:2008cv03183
Plaintiff:
STEVEN G. BOLLING
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HAYMAN, PETER T. ROSELLI, MICHELLE R. RICCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
