Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Savage v. Hartley, et al
as 08-1358
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLYDE E. SAVAGE
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN HARTLEY, Warden, Limon Corr. Facility and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Jebe v. Hartley et al
as 1:2008cv01370
Petitioner:
Quinn McKenzie Jebe
Respondent:
Steven Hartley and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Keck v. Hartley
as 1:2008cv00354
Petitioner:
Michael Keck
Respondent:
Steven Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sims-Dupont v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2007cv02193
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Sims-Dupont
Defendant:
Aristedes W. Zavaras, Steven Hartley, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savage v. Hartley et al
as 1:2007cv01419
Petitioner:
Clyde E. Savage
Respondent:
Steven Hartley and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Le v. Hartley et al
as 1:2007cv01173
Petitioner:
Phong Le
Respondent:
Steven Hartley and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keck v. Zenon et al
as 1:2007cv00987
Plaintiff:
Michael Keck
Defendant:
Carl (I) Zenon, Carl Zenon, Steven (I) Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandoval v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2007cv00309
Plaintiff:
Jason Sandoval
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Cathie Holst, A. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Backus v. Hartley
as 1:2007cv00135
Petitioner:
Michael O. Backus
Respondent:
Steven Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dupont v. Ent Federal Credit Union et al
as 1:2007cv00101
Plaintiff:
Larry Darnell Sims Dupont
Defendant:
Ent Federal Credit Union, Safeway Ry Mtn. Credit Union, Joe Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
