Cases 11 - 20 of 380
Washington v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2023cv02754
Plaintiff:
Richard C Washington
Defendant:
T Wolfe, Stephawn Tate, Matthew Lipscomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Dervona et al
as 1:2023cv02536
Plaintiff:
Elia T. Watkins
Defendant:
Nurse Francisco Dervona, Dr. Alam and Dr. Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Supervising Clerk of District Court of Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv02433
Plaintiff:
Travis Everett Jones
Defendant:
Supervising Clerk of District Court of Maryland, T. Richardson, Commissioner Hesner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Spring Grove's Admin. et al
as 1:2023cv02279
Plaintiff:
Elia T. Watkins
Defendant:
Spring Grove's Admin., Dr. Edko, Dr. Laiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Pesterfield
as 1:2023cv02172
Plaintiff:
Tyrea T. Daniels
Defendant:
Walt Pesterfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Dervona
as 1:2023cv01406
Plaintiff:
Elia T. Watkins
Defendant:
Francisco, Nurse Francisco Dervona, Dr. Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
St. Rose v. Clifton T. Perkins Hospital
as 1:2023cv00916
Plaintiff:
Lloyd St. Rose
Defendant:
Clifton T. Perkins Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smalls v. Bailey et al
as 1:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smalls
Defendant:
William Bailey, Annie D. Harvey and Frank T. Taylor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinley v. Bivens
as 1:2023cv00681
Petitioner:
Gary T. McKinley
Respondent:
Carlos D. Bivens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Perkins et al
as 1:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Charles Campbell
Defendant:
Clifton T. Perkins, John Mbah, Kevin Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
