Cases 11 - 20 of 922
Norwood v. Miles et al
as 2:2023cv02270
Plaintiff:
Khalid Norwood
Defendant:
Sherwin Miles, . Terry, . Carlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Miles et al
as 1:2023cv16342
Petitioner:
Khalid Norwood
Respondent:
Sherwin Miles, . Terry, . Carlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gater v. Miles et al
as 1:2023cv14475
Plaintiff:
Artavia Gater
Defendant:
Sherwin K Miles, Donald A Terry, Craig A Carlook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2015cv50098
Defendant:
Michael Evans, Kelly Herrick, Joseph Yurkovich and others
Plaintiff:
Wade Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manley v. Conn et al
as 3:2023cv03146
Plaintiff:
Douglas L. Manley
Defendant:
Daniel Conn, Wexford Health Sources Inc., Jay Robert Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv50348
Plaintiff:
William Malone and Bill
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Tarry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Kent
as 1:2017cv01249
Plaintiff:
Adam Titus
Defendant:
Kyle Kent, Shawna Joneson, Nurse Sabrina Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pyles v. Freshour et al
as 1:2023cv01281
Petitioner:
Terry L Pyles
Respondent:
Alex Freshour, Ryan Sterbing and Matt Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03521
Plaintiff:
Romell Young
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Chicago Police Department and Terry Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Tillard
as 3:2023cv02366
Petitioner:
Terry Lee Adams
Respondent:
Tillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
