Cases 11 - 20 of 224
Cano v. Decker et al
as 1:2020cv08932
Respondent:
Thomas Decker, Acting Sec. of DHS Chad Wolf, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Wilfredo B CANO and Wilfredo B. Cano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Gonzalez Cruz v. Decker et al
as 1:2020cv07871
Respondent:
Thomas Decker, Chad F. Wolf, Director James McHenry and others
Petitioner:
Nohasses Gonzalez Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Osadolor Osadolor v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv06131
Respondent:
DHS, Chad Wolf, Steven Ahrendt and others
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Osadolor Osadolor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
AVENDADO-PALACIOS v. DECKER et al
as 1:2020cv05976
Respondent:
THOMAS DECKER, Acting Secretary CHAD WOLF and STEVEN AHRENDT
Petitioner:
Michel AVENDADO-PALACIOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ojo v. Decker et al
as 2:2020cv05538
Defendant:
Corecivic, Inc., Paul Borke, Thomas Michael Flynn and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ojo v. Decker et al
as 1:2020cv03221
Defendant:
Corecivic, Inc., Paul Borke, Thomas Michael Flynn and others
Plaintiff:
Olukayode David Ojo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORNEJO v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2020cv04580
Respondent:
Acting Secretary CHAD WOLF, THOMAS DECKER, RON EDWARDS and others
Petitioner:
Noe Cornejo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
A.S.D. v. Decker et al
as 7:2020cv03118
Respondent:
Thomas Decker, Carl E. DuBois and Chad Wolf
Petitioner:
A.S.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Seemangal v. Decker et al
as 1:2020cv03057
Respondent:
Acting Sec. of DHS Chad Wolf, Field Office Dir. Thomas Decker, Acting Secretary Chad Wolf and others
Petitioner:
MAIGHBARRAN SEEMANGAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
