Cases 11 - 20 of 119
CHURUK v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2023cv04258
Plaintiff:
YAROSLAV CHURUK
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT HAMPTON, LIEUTENANT TORRES, LIEUTENANT C. ATKINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
TORRES v. UNUIGBE et al
as 1:2023cv02264
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TORRES
Defendant:
FLORENCE UNUIGBE, DOCTOR MALTA, R.N. CHARLOTTE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ECHEVARRIA v. SGT. TORRE et al
as 2:2023cv00688
Plaintiff:
MOISES ECHEVARRIA
Defendant:
SGT. TORRE, OFFICER VELEZ and DR. HEMSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORRES v. WARREN et al
as 1:2022cv06254
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TORRES
Defendant:
ACTING WARDEN CHARLES WARREN, EX. WARDEN ROBERT SMITH and EX. MEDICAL DIRECTOR KRISTINA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lojo v. Lopez et al
as 2:2022cv04260
Plaintiff:
Wilson Pena Lojo
Defendant:
CO LOPEZ, HARVEY, Zapata and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CREWS v. TORRES et al
as 1:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH CREWS
Defendant:
MAXIMILLANO TORRES, DAVID TORARCHICK and LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. MALLIET et al
as 1:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS and K. W. LEWIS
Defendant:
JOYCE M. MALLIET, THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT, CASE MANAGER MORALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. N'DIAYE et al
as 1:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant:
MR. N'DIAYE, MS. TURNER, MR. TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORRES v. NOGAN
as 2:2021cv12892
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TORRES
Defendant:
PATRICK NOGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES-BONILLA v. N'DIAYE
as 1:2021cv10242
Petitioner:
JONATHAN TORRES-BONILLA
Respondent:
LAMINE N'DIAYE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
