Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Marcoon v. Tucker et al
as 3:2017cv00940
Plaintiff:
Walter Don Marcoon
Defendant:
Randy Tucker, Brian Watson, Madison County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VanSlyke v. Pearl River County et al
as 1:2017cv00164
Plaintiff:
Jacob Heath VanSlyke
Defendant:
Pearl River County, Julie Flowers, Corey Mataya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Tucker et al
as 3:2016cv00390
Plaintiff:
Christina LaShaun Flowers
Defendant:
Randy Tucker, Brian Watson, Unknown Rigsby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torns et al v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
Charles Torns, Jr. and Marilyn L. Torns
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Madison County Supervisors, Randy Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tucker v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00283
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Tucker
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Unknown Ware and SMCI Prea Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonson v. Robinson et al
as 3:2014cv00522
Plaintiff:
Kenny Franklin Edmonson
Defendant:
Laurie Robinson, Cynthia Porter, Mellisa McCarter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Tucker et al
as 3:2013cv00800
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Bryant
Defendant:
P. S. Tucker, H. Holley, B. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. EMCF Host Remedies et al
as 4:2013cv00197
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF Host Remedies, Unknown Thomas, Unknown McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Shaw et al
as 3:2013cv01056
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Bryant
Defendant:
Frank Shaw , P. S. Tucker , Unknown Ovalle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Shaw et al
as 4:2013cv00171
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Bryant
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, P. S. Tucker, Unknown Ovalle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
