Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Nunez (ID 84911) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2015cv03259
Plaintiff:
Eddie Nunez
Defendant:
James Heimgartner , Tammy Martin-Mosley , R. Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grissom (ID 33728) v. Roberts et al
as 5:2015cv03221
Plaintiff:
Richard Grissom
Defendant:
Raymond Roberts , Johnnie Goddard , James Heimgartner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Lyon County Detention Center et al
as 5:2015cv03056
Plaintiff:
Johnny J. Cole, Jr.
Defendant:
Lyon County Detention Center, Kansas, State of, Tammy Risley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leek (ID 63523) v. Owegbo et al
as 5:2015cv03017
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Leek
Defendant:
Innocent Owegbo, Rex Prior, Jim Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffery (ID 100308) v. Martin et al
as 5:2015cv03011
Plaintiff:
Corey C. Jeffery
Defendant:
Tammy Martin, Jarred Watson, Rudy Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGhee v. Kefier et al
as 5:2013cv03039
Plaintiff:
Kirk Douglas McGhee
Defendant:
Tammy Kefier and Chris Warholic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rucker (ID 82532) v. Gilmore et al
as 5:2013cv03028
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rucker
Defendant:
(fnu) Gilmore, Tammy McCullough, Jeffrey Fewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Golston (ID 40507) v. Bloomquist et al
as 5:2012cv03046
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Golston
Defendant:
Ray Bloomquist, James Moore, Brice Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Aramark Food Service, Inc. et al
as 5:2008cv03157
Plaintiff:
Todd Carlton Smith
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Inc., Rusty Anderson, Tammy Parker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hood v. Murphy et al
as 5:2008cv03112
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ian Hood
Defendant:
Craig Murphy, (fnu) Whitaker, T Hall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
