Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Radcliffe v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 4:2019cv01699
Defendant:
Alexander Chyorny and County of Santa Clara
Plaintiff:
Carlos Radcliffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01328
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
(PC) Serna v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2018cv01650
Defendant:
Sullivan, Doctor Montegrande, Gonzales and others
Plaintiff:
Norberto Serna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Nekamoto et al
as 3:2018cv07279
Plaintiff:
Randall B. Pierce
Defendant:
Dr. Jeffrey Nekamoto and County of Santa Clara California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrison et al v. Trump et al
as 3:2018cv03251
Defendant:
The Attorney General, Public Defender Office, Jeff Rosen and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Walker, Steve Garrison and Marty Estrada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison et al v. Trump et al
as 4:2018cv03251
Plaintiff:
Steve Garrison, Marty Estrada and Donald Walker
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Richard Seeborg, Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emmanuel Brew v. Daniel Fehderau, et al
as 18-15752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMMANUEL LARS BREW
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL FEHDERAU, Deputy District Attorney Santa Clara County, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Garrison v. The State of California et al
as 4:2018cv00639
Plaintiff:
Steve Garrison
Defendant:
The State of California, Edmund G. Brown, The Judicial Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ko v. County of Santa Clara
as 3:2017cv05113
Plaintiff:
Lily Ko
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrison v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 3:2017cv05043
Plaintiff:
Steve Garrison
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Sherrifs Office, Board of Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
