Cases 11 - 20 of 85
v. Owl Feather-Gorbey et al
as 5:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Chief Col Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Tennessee, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Middleton v. State of Kentucky
as 5:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Brenda Middleton
Defendant:
State of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawan v. State of Kentucky
as 1:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
Yusef M. Dawan
Defendant:
State of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. State of Kentucky et al
as 4:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Sandy R. Thompson
Defendant:
State of Kentucky, City of Owensboro, KSP Officer Nathan Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Sandy R. Thompson
Defendant:
Nathan Jenkins, Kristen Dirickson, Ben Flurry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Renfro v. People of the State of Kentucky
as 3:2022cv00230
Petitioner:
Phillip W. Renfro
Respondent:
People of the State of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burke v. People of the State of Kentucky
as 1:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr.
Defendant:
People of the State of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rigsby v. Beshear et al
as 5:2021cv00915
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Rigsby, Jr
Defendant:
Andy Beshear, Great State of Kentucky and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. State of Kentucky
as 5:2021cv00094
Petitioner:
Jason Andrew Watts
Respondent:
State of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Butler et al v. CHFS et al
as 6:2020cv00234
Defendant:
CHFS, State of Kentucky and Andy Beshear
Plaintiff:
Freddie W. Tallant and William H. Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
