Cases 11 - 20 of 288
Ward v. Buss
as 6:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
Thomas Jesse Ward
Respondent:
David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Nor T. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Mark Knutson, David Louthan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkins v. FNU
as 5:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
Thomas Adkins
Defendant:
LNU FNU, Oklahoma City Police Department, Bryan Locke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hagen v. Girdner et al
as 6:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Charles David Hagen
Defendant:
TJ Girdner, Johnny Dallis, Mary Burlison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bureau Of Prisons
as 5:2022cv01098
Plaintiff:
Shannon Thomas Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. LNU
as 5:2022cv01076
Plaintiff:
Shannon Thomas Pitts
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2022cv01027
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lemeal Cooper
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority, Board Of County Commissioners for Oklahoma County and Michael Thomas Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cox v. Clayton
as 5:2022cv00904
Petitioner:
William Thomas Cox
Respondent:
Deon Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burkhalter v. Gray et al
as 4:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Marquise Burkhalter
Defendant:
Kevin Gray, Grace Hobbs, Adam J Derycke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Crow
as 5:2022cv00592
Petitioner:
Trent Thomas
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
