Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Ceparano v. Suffolk County
as 14-311
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony J. Ceparano
Defendant / Appellee:
Suffolk County, New York, Steve Levy, Suffolk County Police Department and others
Harris v. Suffolk County et al
as 2:2013cv04243
Respondent:
Vincent F. DeMarco, Charles Ewald, Thomas J. Spota and others
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. The judges authority in the unified court system Of Suffolk County et al
as 2:2013cv04215
Defendant:
Micheal J Ahern, Dennis M. Brown, Catherine A. Cahill and others
Plaintiff:
Sabas Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Spota et al
as 2:2012cv04684
Defendant:
Hon. James FX Doyle, Det. Maureen O'Dea, Thomas J. Spota and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Hon. James Doyle et al
as 2:2012cv04359
Defendant:
18-b Attorney Christopher Brocato, Arresting Officer ID SPD 34418, Joseph N. Brittelli and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whaley v. The State of New York et al
as 2:2012cv02277
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Lucie Kwon and others
Plaintiff:
John Whaley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelzer v. Suffolk County Police Officer John Doe et al
as 1:2010cv05329
Petitioner:
William Aubrey Pelzer, Jr.
Respondent:
Suffolk County Police Officer John Doe, Gary J. Weber, Thomas J. Spota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pelosi v. Spota et al
as 2:2007cv05030
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Pelosi
Defendant:
Thomas J. Spota, III and Janet Albertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flores v. Levy et al
as 2:2007cv03753
Plaintiff:
Ramon Flores
Defendant:
Steve Levy, Thomas J. Spota, III, Wilma Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
