Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plump v. Goetz
as 1:2017cv00559
Plaintiff:
William Matthew Plump
Defendant:
C.R. Goetz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plump v. Goetz
as 1:2016cv03044
Petitioner:
William Matthew Plump
Respondent:
C.R. Goetz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Failes v. Garfield County Detention Facility et al
as 5:2013cv00638
Plaintiff:
William Matthew Failes
Defendant:
Garfield County Detention Facility and Jerry Niles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nixon v. Matthews et al
as 3:2012cv00301
Plaintiff:
Paul Andrew Nixon
Defendant:
William Matthews, S. Laurent, C. B. Bowlan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00195
Plaintiff:
Akeem Muhammad
Defendant:
Marvin Davis, Elio Madan, William Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMPSON v. CITY OF COATSVILLE, PA. et al
as 2:2010cv00100
Plaintiff:
CHALMERS A. SIMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF COATSVILLE, PA., CITY OF COATSVILLE, PA., CITY OF WEST CHESTER, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. City of Coatsville, Pa. et al
as 1:2009cv01882
Plaintiff:
Chalmers A. Simpson
Defendant:
City of Coatsville, Pa., City of West Chester, Pa., Coatsville Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Florida Department, et al
as 1:2005cv21204
Plaintiff:
Vincent Faustino Rivera
Defendant:
Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, Jeb Bush, Rod Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Perper et al
as 0:2007cv60506
Plaintiff:
Vincent F. Rivera
Defendant:
Joshua Perper, Bob Butterworth, Bill Janes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Lamar et al
as 6:2007cv00597
Plaintiff:
Vincent F. Rivera
Defendant:
Lawson Lamar, Paul I. Perez, Mel Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
