Cases 11 - 20 of 97
Durand v. Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
James Walter Durand
Defendant:
Probation and Parole and State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter v. M.T.C. et al
as 3:2021cv00737
Plaintiff:
Bryant Walter and Walter Bryant
Defendant:
M.T.C., EMCF Maintenance Dept. Personnel, Unit Manager Derrick Smith and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Unknown
as 3:2021cv00666
Plaintiff:
Walter James Brown
Defendant:
Unknown
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Whitehurst v. Vereen
as 3:2021cv00598
Plaintiff:
Anthony Martiz Whitehurst, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Walter Vereen
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Burton v. Rankin County Circuit Court et al
as 3:2021cv00439
Defendant:
Rankin County Circuit Court and William R. Labarre
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Walter Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Circuit Court of Rankin County Etc
as 3:2021cv00440
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Rankin County Etc
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Walter Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fields v. Vereen
as 3:2020cv00755
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden Walter Vereen
Plaintiff:
Reginald Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cross v. Vereen
as 3:2020cv00747
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Paul Cross
Defendant:
Warden Walter Vereen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brayboy v. Vereen
as 3:2020cv00626
Defendant:
Walter Vereen
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Brayboy
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boddie v. Vereen
as 3:2020cv00606
Plaintiff:
Quintonio Boddie
Defendant:
Warden Walter Vereen
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
