Cases 11 - 20 of 115
WILLIAMS v. PHILBIN
as 1:2022cv00064
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN EDWARD PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wolchuk v. Filbin et al
as 1:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Bradley Zach Wolchuk
Defendant:
Warden Edward Filbin, Officer Screws, Officer Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PHILBIN
as 1:2022cv00057
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN EDWARD PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. PHILBIN
as 1:2022cv00045
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN EDWARD PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. PHILIBIN
as 1:2022cv00039
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
Warden EDWARD PHILIBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRAYSON v. PHILBIN
as 5:2022cv00083
Petitioner:
BENNIE BERNARD GRAYSON
Respondent:
WARDEN EDWARD PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Harris et al
as 1:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome White
Defendant:
Latasha Harris, Sgt. T'onnie Lane, Warden Edward Philbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spaulding v. Nunn et al
as 5:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Richard Patrick Spaulding
Defendant:
Warden Scott Nunn, Asst Warden Edward Mayfield, Chaplain FNU Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PHILBIN
as 1:2022cv00007
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN EDWARD PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. PHILBIN
as 5:2022cv00042
Petitioner:
DESI LEE HYMAN JACKSON
Respondent:
WARDEN EDWARD PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
