Cases 11 - 20 of 419
Blackwell v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
Ryan Demond Blackwell and Goo Zuhayr El
Defendant:
Richard Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lovejoy v. Greene et al
as 3:2024cv03017
Plaintiff:
Laurence Lovejoy
Defendant:
Brittany Greene, Tara Goins, Shana Clarkson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv50001
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation, Illinois Department of Corrections, Latoya Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Nolan Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bohn v. Does et al
as 3:2023cv03949
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Bohn
Defendant:
Jane Does and Richard Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bashum v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv03314
Plaintiff:
Bernard Bashum
Defendant:
Keenan M Smith, Brittany Greene, Kimberly Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lanier v. Watson et al
as 3:2023cv03470
Plaintiff:
Jim F. Lanier
Defendant:
Richard Watson and Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv50348
Plaintiff:
William Malone and Bill
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Tarry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Winnebago County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv50209
Plaintiff:
Fred Douglas Ballard
Defendant:
Winnebago County Jail, Sgt. Robin Watson and C/O Atchley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. USA
as 3:2023cv01800
Petitioner:
Dinish Watson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bernard v. Wilks et al
as 3:2023cv50130
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard
Defendant:
Justin Wilks, Andrea Tack, Joanna Kemmeren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
