Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Clerk United States District Court WD-WA et al v. Route et al
as 2:2017cv01509
Plaintiff:
Clerk United States District Court WD-WA and launi weber
Defendant:
United States Attorney WD-WA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Pennick v. Lystad et al
as 3:2017cv05152
Plaintiff:
Curlin Pennick, III
Defendant:
Erin Lystad, Robert Weber and Sara Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv05993
Plaintiff:
Charles V Reed
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Richard Morgan, G. Steven Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allah et al v. Christensen et al
as 2:2016cv01543
Plaintiff:
Allah
Defendant:
Barbara Christensen, Scott Weber, Michael J Killian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allah v. Christensen, et al
as 4:2016cv05128
Plaintiff:
Allah
Defendant:
Barbara Christensen, Scott Weber, Michael J Killian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniels v. Stewart et al
as 3:2015cv05943
Plaintiff:
Peter J. McDaniels
Defendant:
Belinda Stewart, Bernard Warner, Earl Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troupe v. Swain et al
as 3:2014cv05886
Plaintiff:
David Troupe
Defendant:
William Swain, Thomas A L'Heureux, James W Jolly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Schaller et al
as 3:2014cv05827
Plaintiff:
Derek Caldwell
Defendant:
Gregory Schaller , Bob Weber and Stafford Creek Medical Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kunkle et al
as 2:2013cv00623
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
Lynn Kunkle, Leann Cave, K Fritze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weber v. Washington State Department of Corrections
as 2:2009cv05087
Petitioner:
Charles W Weber
Respondent:
Washington State Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
