Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 11 - 20 of 64
GHOLSTON v. CANNON et al
as 5:2018cv00159
Plaintiff: DEANTE GHOLSTON
Defendant: MICHAEL CANNON, WILLIAM POWELL, GEORGE BALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLEMONS v. SELLERS et al
as 5:2018cv00152
Plaintiff: CHE BERNARD CLEMONS
Defendant: ERIC SELLERS, ROBERT TOOLE, MICHAEL CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CANNON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00137
Plaintiff: ROY MANDELL SMITH
Defendant: MICHAEL CANNON, K FORTS, JOHANNES GOODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRAZIER v. POWELL et al
as 5:2018cv00092
Plaintiff: OLIVER J FRAZIER
Defendant: WILLIAM POWELL, MICHAEL CANNON, TIMOTHY G VAUGHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2018cv00034
Plaintiff: MIGUEL JACKSON
Defendant: GREGORY C DOZIER, ERIC SELLERS, MICHAEL CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEABOLT v. SELLERS et al
as 5:2018cv00028
Plaintiff: GARY SEABOLT
Defendant: ERIC SELLERS, WILLIAM POWELL, JUNE BISHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GHOLSTON v. POWELL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00479
Plaintiff: DEANTE GHOLSTON
Defendant: WILLIAM POWELL, JAMES D SMITH and MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. CANNON et al
as 5:2017cv00460
Plaintiff: MIGUEL JACKSON
Defendant: MICHAEL CANNON, JUNE BISHOP, WILLIAM POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRY v. SELLARS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00424
Plaintiff: JARMOND CURRY
Defendant: ERIC SELLARS, MELINDA DAVIS, SHEPARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONNELLY v. SELLERS et al
as 5:2017cv00416
Plaintiff: PATRICK LEE CONNELLY
Defendant: ERIC SELLERS, BRUCE CHATMAN, MICHAEL CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?