Cases 11 - 20 of 375
Ashby v. Doyle et al
as 3:2023cv02968
Plaintiff:
Defonte Ashby
Defendant:
Robert T. Doyle, Roberto Walton and Beverly Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert S Woods v. Warden
as 8:2023cv00986
Petitioner:
Robert S Woods
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Woods v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01002
Petitioner:
Robert S Woods and Robert S. Woods
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01597
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence C. Wood v. LCMC Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C. Wood
Defendant:
LCMC Hospital, LA County MCJ Urgent Care, Medical Dept MCJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Caver v. Corter et al
as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Denell Caver
Defendant:
E. Corter, D. Baker, J. Avila and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. EDD-UI, Los Angeles et al
as 2:2022cv09072
Petitioner:
Lawrence C. Wood
Respondent:
EDD-UI, Los Angeles and EDD-UI, Claims Department/ Sacramento California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood v. EDD-UI, Los Angeles et al
as 4:2022cv07862
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C. Wood
Defendant:
EDD-UI, Los Angeles and EDD-UI, Claims Department/ Sacramento California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashby v. Woods et al
as 3:2022cv07448
Plaintiff:
Defonte Terell Ashby
Defendant:
Beverly Woods, Erin Lynch, Tony Milani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashby v. Woods et al
as 3:2022cv07445
Petitioner:
Defonte T. Ashby
Respondent:
Beverly Woods, Erin Lynch, Kim Cattreres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
