Cases 11 - 20 of 408
Woods v. USA
as 3:2023cv00768
Petitioner:
Donna H Woods
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Shell v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
Robert Noble Shell
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Teiva Bell, Harris County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guzman v. Smith et al
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Albert Guadalupe Guzman
Defendant:
Kenny B. Smith, Jesus E. Rojas Torres and Correction Officer FNU Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Jasper County Correctional Center et al
as 1:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mitchell Woods
Defendant:
Jasper County Correctional Center and FNU Hawthorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perales v. Officer Woods et al
as 3:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Manuel V Perales
Defendant:
Officer Woods, Ms. Marshall, Ms.Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Rosalez
as 1:2023cv00032
Petitioner:
Jonathan E. Woods
Respondent:
FNU Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wood v. Morales
as 5:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Ann Delynn Wood
Defendant:
Vecentie Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Woods v. Limestone County Detention Center
as 6:2022cv01084
Plaintiff:
Waylon Woods
Defendant:
Limestone County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Headspeth v Akin et al
as 4:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
Robin Headspeth
Defendant:
N Lane Akin, Brandon S. Wood and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood v. Lumpkin
as 7:2022cv00204
Petitioner:
David Edward Wood
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
