Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Lopez Ortiz v. Livingston et al
as 4:2016cv03449
Plaintiff:
Marcos Lopez Ortiz
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, C. Landis, Betty J. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemming et al v. City Of Rockford et al
as 3:2016cv50348
Plaintiff:
Demario Flemming, Jay'zeon Brown Flemming and Jacquelyn Brown
Defendant:
City Of Rockford, Illinois Department of Children Famiily Services, Unknown Reporting Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carraway v. Zeon et al
as 4:2016cv02754
Plaintiff:
Cleophus Carraway
Defendant:
Zae Zeon, Jamie Williams, Stephanie Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Eagans v. William Stephens, et al
as 16-20318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD RAY EAGANS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, TRACY BAILEY, TIFFANY BENSEN and others
Bell v. Strong et al
as 4:2016cv00461
Petitioner:
Anthony J. Bell
Respondent:
Kelly Strong, Brian Smith, Christina Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eagans v. Williams et al
as 4:2015cv00413
Plaintiff:
Richard Eagans
Defendant:
Stephen Williams, Tracy Bailey, Tiffany Bensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullins v. Klein et al
as 4:2014cv03613
Petitioner:
Patrick Lee Mullins
Respondent:
Klein, Bryan Hancock, Jeanette Pegoda-Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Guthrie v. Zae Zeon, et al
as 14-20726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. GUTHRIE
Defendant - Appellee:
MEDICAL DOCTOR ZAE YOUNG ZEON, STEPHEN WILLIAMS, JOHN WHITE, Chief Classifications and others
Guthrie v. Zeon et al
as 4:2014cv02732
Plaintiff:
James M. Guthrie
Defendant:
Zae Young Zeon, Stephen Williams, John White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Clay v. Zae Zeon, et al
as 14-20607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS H. CLAY
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR ZAE YOUNG ZEON, DOCTOR BOBBY VINCENT, DOCTOR BETTY WILLIAMS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
