Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Walls v. Gibeson et al
as 6:2021cv00352
Plaintiff:
Tracy Walls
Defendant:
Julie Gibeson, Dave Brown and Christina Pries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02150
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cooke v. Harrold
as 6:2020cv01964
Respondent:
Clifton Harrold
Petitioner:
Tracy Justin Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cooke v. Pre-trial Services at Lane County Adult Corrections
as 6:2020cv00481
Respondent:
Pre-trial Services at Lane County Adult Corrections
Petitioner:
Tracy Justin Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sandoval v. Poe et al
as 6:2019cv00710
Defendant:
Osborne, CCS - Correct Care Solutions, McIrvin and others
Plaintiff:
Brandy Marie Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clardy v. McFarlane et al
as 6:2018cv02175
Defendant:
Jane Wagner, Craig Prins, Kelly Rath and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benet v. Salem Parole Board
as 3:2017cv01923
Petitioner:
Tracy Benet
Respondent:
Salem Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arthur et al v. Willamette Community Health Solutions et al
as 6:2017cv00885
Defendant:
Richard Abraham, Russ Boring, City of Springfield and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Arthur, Donna Christian and Jeffery Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forbes v. Cain
as 2:2016cv02076
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Tracy Gary Shannon Forbes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benet v. Josephine County District Attorney
as 1:2016cv01689
Plaintiff:
Tracy Benet
Defendant:
Josephine County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
