Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 11 - 20 of 39,634
McKenna v. Conway
as 1:2024cv02161
Plaintiff: Kevin H. McKenna
Defendant: Matthew R. Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sifuentes v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv00130
Plaintiff: Gerardo Roel Sifuentes
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinson v. Warden, FCI Jesup
as 2:2024cv00068
Petitioner: Raheem T. Brinson
Respondent: Warden, FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. West et al
as 6:2024cv00024
Plaintiff: Louis Davis
Defendant: Warden Mr. West and Brinden Murry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Ward et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff: William R. Jackson
Defendant: Timothy C. Ward, Kim Patton-Johnson and Stephanie Damiels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinkley v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff: Jamonte Brinkley
Defendant: Tyrone Oliver, Andrew Mcfarlane, Veronica Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. WIZA
as 4:2024cv00071
Petitioner: FABIAN WOODS, JR
Respondent: Warden SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAPMAN v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00150
Plaintiff: YAQUAN LAVETT SANDY CHAPMAN
Respondent: STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOLLINGSHED v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00151
Plaintiff: GARY HOLLINGSHED
Defendant: SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS and AMBER COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AMERSON v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00149
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER L AMERSON
Defendant: COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, DEPUTY WARDEN DERRICK MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN CURTIS L JEFFERIES, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?