Cases 11 - 20 of 44,700
Mosley v. USA
as 3:2024cv01326
Petitioner:
Danyahle L. Mosley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gines v. Dearmond
as 3:2024cv01318
Plaintiff:
Cordell L. Gines
Defendant:
A. Dearmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Artis v. Nurse et al
as 1:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
Montez Artis
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse, Rob Jeffreys, David Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michalski v. Purillo et al
as 1:2024cv04038
Plaintiff:
Cortez Michalski
Defendant:
Purillo, Well Path and Mike Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gambaiani v. Green et al
as 3:2024cv03123
Plaintiff:
Grant Gambaiani
Defendant:
Brittany Green, Latoya Hughes, Kindell Kestner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Roberson et al
as 1:2024cv04021
Plaintiff:
Drew Logan
Defendant:
J.D Roberson, D.R Clark, LeAnn Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Demetrius H. Nichols
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Dr. Garcia, K Osmundon and others
Petitioner:
Jeffrey J. Neslund and Michael D. Robbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv50111
Plaintiff:
Ronald McKinney
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bynum v. City of Bridgton Police Dept.
as 1:2024cv04029
Plaintiff:
Darryl R Bynum, Jr
Defendant:
City of Bridgton Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. White et al
as 1:2024cv04003
Plaintiff:
Dimari Terry
Defendant:
Raymond White, Reinaldo Sanchez, Jerrell Danner-Lardino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
