Cases 201 - 210 of 17,229
El-Bey v. Brown
as 1:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Sergeant Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wardrick v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Robert Wardrick
Respondent:
State of Maryland and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00119
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Holden v. Donaldson et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Gregory T. Holden
Defendant:
D. Donaldson, Sr., Nurse K. Coleman, WCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tapia v. Maryland Attorney General
as 1:2024cv00135
Petitioner:
Jose Tapia
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Stewart et al
as 1:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Robert Edgar King
Defendant:
Kimberly Stewart, Robert Saliby and D. Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Conaway et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Xavier Conaway, Circuit Court for Baltimore City Criminal System, Jennifer B. Schiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Diggs v. Dupree et al
as 1:2023cv03537
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Diggs
Defendant:
Sergeant Dupree, Baltimore County Department of Corrections and Zoey Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Piccirilli v. USA-2255
as 1:2024cv00590
Petitioner:
James Ian Piccirilli
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
