Cases 201 - 210 of 10,843
Goff v. Crow et al
as 5:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
Antoine Goff
Defendant:
Scott Crow, Amber Martin, Mark Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wright v. Garfield County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Wright
Defendant:
Garfield County Jail, Corey Rink and Daylyn Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bain v. LCRF/GOE et al
as 5:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Keith Elliott Bain
Defendant:
LCRF/GOE, Timms LNU and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bain v. GOE et al
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Keith Elliott Bain
Defendant:
GOE/ LRCF, Warden Cole, John Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Public Defenders Office, et al.
as 4:2023cv00561
Defendant:
Jermaine T S Washington, Public Defenders Office, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine TS Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. David L Moss et al
as 4:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Washington and Jermaine Torrey Washington
Defendant:
David L Moss, Marcus Major Berry, D O Sixkiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Rinks et al
as 5:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Andrew Byrd
Defendant:
Corey Rinks and Dylyn Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Savage v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Marquice D Savage
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, Adams, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Hamilton
as 5:2023cv01182
Petitioner:
Cole Isaac Phillips
Respondent:
Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cain v. Bridges
as 5:2023cv01150
Petitioner:
Samuel Patrick Cain, Jr
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
