Cases 211 - 220 of 14,749
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Gillard et al
as 3:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ishmael Ali Evans and Ishmael Ali Danud Evans
Defendant:
Carl Gillard, Brandon Wilbanks, Brandon Holdstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Latham v. USA
as 1:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Damian Jermaine Latham
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Godsey v. USA
as 1:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Nicholas Paul Godsey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Morris v. United States
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Darrell Ray Morris
Defendant:
United States
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas v. Prentiss County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Marcel Thomas
Defendant:
Prentiss County Jail and Jeff Davis County Jail
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blount v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2023cv00482
Petitioner:
Gregory Earl Blount
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Canton Municipal County Capacity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mathis v. U S America
as 3:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Bernard Mathis
Respondent:
U S America and MDOC Commissioner Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Chunn v. Madison County Jail
as 3:2023cv03166
Plaintiff:
William Glenn Chunn
Defendant:
Madison County Jail
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
