Cases 211 - 220 of 3,660
Lacey v. Overman
as 8:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Terrance Adrian Lacey
Defendant:
Mark Overman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Demateojuan v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Mateo Demateojuan
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morse v. USA
as 4:2023cv03091
Petitioner:
Bryan Morse
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Devers v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2023cv00188
Petitioner:
Jason Devers
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Npimnee v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2023cv00169
Petitioner:
Hope Npimnee
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez-Garcia v. Sabatka-Rine
as 8:2023cv00157
Petitioner:
David Gonzalez-Garcia
Respondent:
Diane Sabatka-Rine
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ringland v. Rossiter et al
as 8:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mark Ringland
Defendant:
Chief Justice Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Senior Justice Joseph F. Bataillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. USA
as 8:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
Christopher Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. Eberhardt et al
as 8:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Kevin G. Smith
Defendant:
Rick Eberhardt, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
