Cases 211 - 220 of 10,868
Cantrell v. White
as 4:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Christy Cantrell
Respondent:
Tamika White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yalartai v. Kight et al
as 5:2023cv01181
Plaintiff:
Harmond D Yalartai
Defendant:
Jesse Kight, Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority and Board of County Commissioners for the County of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierson v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Aaron Nathaniel Pierson
Defendant:
Monica Smtih, Mary Martin, Kevin Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
William D Jones
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Tulsa County District Court
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Thomas Allen Moore
Defendant:
Tulsa County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Jr. v. White et al
as 5:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
John Paul Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Aaron White, Luke Pettigrew, C. Longhorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andino v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Brianna Andino
Defendant:
William Hobbs and Kevin Buttler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plater v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Raheem La'monze Plater
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Christine Topping and FNU Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elix v. Vann et al
as 5:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Michael Carey Elix
Defendant:
Timothy Vann, Wayne McKinney and Stephens County SFDP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker et al v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Felisha Parker and Laresha Parker
Defendant:
Lawton City of, James T Smith, Terry Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
