Cases 21 - 30 of 613
Owens, Jr. v. Crews et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Lane, C. Crews, A. Figueroa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. Sheiman et al
as 6:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Wayne McBride, Jr
Defendant:
Richard Sheiman, John Mina, Buddy Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. DOE
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JAMELL M COOPER
Defendant:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles v. Jane Does 1-2
as 6:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lamar Giles
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle, Leon v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv20560
Plaintiff:
Leon Battle
Defendant:
Glenn P. Miller, James Banks, Omar Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle, Leon v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv20563
Plaintiff:
Leon Battle and Leon Carr
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, P. Ghent, Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole, Vincent L. v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2024cv20551
Plaintiff:
Vincent Leo Poole
Defendant:
State of Florida, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheffield v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00110
Petitioner:
Lance Javon Sheffield
Respondent:
Ricky Dixon, John Doe, John-Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harpo-Brown v. FNU et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Defendant:
Gunther FNU, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. LAVORADO et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONATHAN MITCHELL
Defendant:
M LAVORADO, DAIQUIRI DUNCAN, LOPEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
