Cases 21 - 30 of 321
Mourning v. IRS-Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2023cv00970
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Mourning
Defendant:
IRS-Internal Revenue Service, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Richson-Bey v. Palmer et al
as 1:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
Sean Jeffery Richson-Bey
Defendant:
William Palmer, Melina Benninghoff, William Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Richson-Bey v. The People of the State of California
as 1:2023cv00566
Petitioner:
Sean Jeffery Richson-Bey
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Richson-Bey v. Palmer et al
as 1:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
Sean Jeffery Richson-Bey
Defendant:
W. Palmer, M. Benninghoff and Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Daniel v. Lynch et al
as 2:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Brant Q. Daniel and Brant Q Daniel
Defendant:
Jeffery Lynch, S. Ramirez, K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jacques v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Michael E Jacques and Michael E. Jacques
Defendant:
Jeff Macamber, Jeffery Lynch, Kelly Franceshi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jeffery
as 5:2022cv05308
Plaintiff:
Donald C. Jeffery and Donald D. Jeffery
Defendant:
A. Pelayo, M. Salas and P. Amaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Richson-Bey v. Parks
as 1:2022cv00865
Plaintiff:
Sean Jeffery Richson-Bey
Defendant:
S. Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Richson-Bey v. Juarez
as 1:2022cv00567
Plaintiff:
Sean Jeffery Richson-Bey
Defendant:
J. Juarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
