Cases 21 - 30 of 373
Earl v. Montgomery County Jail
as 4:2023cv01552
Plaintiff:
James Jordan Earl
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Britt et al
as 4:2023cv01172
Plaintiff:
Vernon King, Jr
Defendant:
M P Britt, Blake Lamb, D. Blackshire and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Arrington v. Jordan
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ruben Tyran Arrington
Defendant:
FNU Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrington v. Jordan
as 1:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Ruben Tyran Arrington
Defendant:
FNU Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Coleman et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Byron Keith Harmon
Defendant:
R. Coleman, Barbara Kent, Rachael Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Lamesa Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jordan Paul Gibson
Defendant:
Lamesa Police Department and Sgt NFN Thorton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Molinar v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arturo Molinar
Defendant:
Taylor County Jail, FNU White, FNU Cockeroll and others
Respondent:
FNU Wittington, Jordan Magee, Judge Jeff Propst and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Sauseda et al
as 5:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
Jordan Paul Gibson
Respondent:
Johnny Sauseda, Philip Mack Furlow, Judge Reed A. Filley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jordan v. Giardino
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Trevor Jordan
Defendant:
H. Giardino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Hardy
as 4:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
Tyrone Eugene Jordan
Respondent:
Johnathan Hardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
