Cases 21 - 30 of 334
Nieber v. Robertson
as 3:2023cv00174
Petitioner:
Toren Nieber
Respondent:
Jim Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Edwards v. Jim Robertson
as 5:2023cv00126
Petitioner:
Anthony Edwards
Respondent:
Jim Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Robertson et al
as 3:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Calvester Houston Stewart
Defendant:
Pelican Bay State Prison, Jim Robertson and Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunbar v. Robertson
as 3:2022cv09121
Petitioner:
Eddie Dunbar
Respondent:
Jim Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Fields v. Robertson
as 2:2022cv02245
Petitioner:
Bryant E. Fields
Respondent:
Jim Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rosas v. Robertson
as 5:2022cv07765
Petitioner:
Manuel Dejesus Rosas
Respondent:
James Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Drew v. Robertson
as 4:2022cv05694
Petitioner:
Karl D. Drew
Respondent:
Jim Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Robertson v. The People of the State of California et al
as 2:2022cv01557
Petitioner:
Marlon Robertson
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and S. Peery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Iran Lamont Johnson v. Jim Robertson
as 2:2022cv06215
Petitioner:
Iran Lamont Johnson
Respondent:
Jim Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Baca v. Robertson
as 2:2022cv01481
Petitioner:
James Martin Baca, Sr.
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and James Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
