Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Gordon-Bey v. Withers et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Micah J. Gordon-Bey and Micah J. Gordon
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
United States of America and Warden S. D. Withers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Quinn v. Withers et al
as 3:2021cv00117
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Quinn
Defendant:
Warden SD Withers and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stallings v. Withers et al
as 3:2021cv00118
Defendant:
Warden Shannon D. Withers and United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
David Christopher Stallings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Webster v. Withers
as 3:2021cv00119
Plaintiff:
Demario Webster
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden SD Withers and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Botero v. Withers
as 3:2021cv00110
Plaintiff:
Richard F. Botero
Defendant:
Warden Shannon D. Withers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tinsley v. Withers
as 3:2021cv00064
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Shannon Withers
Plaintiff:
Scott Tinsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jerdine v. Withers et al
as 3:2021cv00020
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Anthony-Lewis Jerdine
Defendant:
Warden Shannon D. Withers and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Weaver v. Withers
as 3:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Warden S. D. Withers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jerdine v. Withers et al
as 3:2020cv00808
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lewis Jerdine
Defendant:
William P. Barr and Warden Shannon D. Withers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasco v. Withers
as 3:2020cv00794
Defendant:
Shannon B. Withers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Guillermo F. Vasco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
