Cases 21 - 30 of 149
Harley v. Clark et al
as 3:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Tyree M. Harley
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark and Martin Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Officer's of Metro County Correction's et al
as 3:2021cv00750
Plaintiff:
Scott Allen Martin
Defendant:
Officer's of Metro County Correction's and Officer Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Che-Adkins v. Mosley et al
as 6:2021cv00184
Plaintiff:
Frank Melvin Che-Adkins
Defendant:
Jamie Mosley, Travis Cathers, Shawn Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00452
Plaintiff:
Jason Alexander Cox
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, Dwayne Clark, Martin Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Jaquez-Loera v. Harmon et al
as 1:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
Martin Jaquez-Loera
Defendant:
Jana Marple, Southern Health Partners and Stephen Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Beard et al
as 0:2021cv00050
Petitioner:
Donald Lynn Martin
Respondent:
H. Allen Beard and David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eakes v. County of Fulton et al
as 5:2021cv00038
Defendant:
Stantham Williams, County of Fulton, James Martin and others
Plaintiff:
James Eakes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Wellpath
as 3:2021cv00147
Defendant:
Wellpath
Plaintiff:
Melvin Jerome Martin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Clark et al
as 3:2021cv00103
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Department of Correction Medical Department, Sgt Elmore, Martin Baker and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Detainees - Inmates and Shawn E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Louisville Metro Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Broderick Brooks
Defendant:
Deputy Director Martin Baker and Louisville Metro Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
