Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Billizone v. Jefferson Parish Correctional Center et al
as 2:2014cv01263
Plaintiff:
Ernest Billizone, Sr.
Defendant:
Jefferson Parish Correctional Center, Sue Ellen Monfra, Newell Normand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooks v. Cain et al
as 2:2014cv00748
Plaintiff:
George Cooks
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Orange v. Geo Group Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00806
Plaintiff:
Randell Orange
Defendant:
Geo Group Inc, James LeBlanc, Terry Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2014cv00174
Plaintiff:
Robert McQueen
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Raman Singh, Robert C Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00048
Respondent:
N Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Demond Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Lamotte et al
as 3:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Demond Cook
Defendant:
Sid Gautreaux, Alfred Glasper, Dennis Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maize v. Monfra et al
as 2:2013cv05911
Plaintiff:
Jacoby Maize
Defendant:
Sue Ellen Monfra, Gary Cook, Sgt. Kerrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Normand et al
as 2:2013cv04911
Plaintiff:
Terrey Williams
Defendant:
Newell D. Normand , Lieutenant Cook, Simmie Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. USA
as 6:2013cv02142
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jehon Pol Wilson Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cockrum v. Ellis et al
as 2:2013cv04860
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Louis Cockrum
Defendant:
Simon Ellis, Robert Tanner, Wayne Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
