Cases 21 - 30 of 183
Halsell v. Obama
as 1:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Tracy Halsell
Defendant:
Barack H Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nalls v. Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Larry Nalls
Defendant:
Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office, Mathis H. Heck, Lee C. Falke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenn v. Basham et al
as 1:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Glenn
Defendant:
C/o Basham, C/o McCoy and Warden Erdos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenn v. Basham et al
as 2:2022cv01904
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Glenn
Defendant:
C/o Basham, C/o McCoy and Warden Erdos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendrick v. Chamber-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Mark Kendrick
Defendant:
Annette Chamber-Smith, Ronald T. Erdos, Linnea Mahlman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butts v Black
as 1:2022cv00257
Petitioner:
Tamir H Butts and Tamir H. Butts
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clegg v. Warden, Lake Erie Correctional Institution
as 2:2022cv00503
Petitioner:
Louis H Clegg, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Lake Erie Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Folley v. Gorman et al
as 3:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Derek Folley
Defendant:
Barbara P Gorman, Mr. Jonathan W. Sauline, Jr., Mathias H Heck, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00003
Petitioner:
Martin H. Ross
Respondent:
Warden, London Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones, et al v. Yost, et al
as 5:2021cv01614
Plaintiff:
Darrell H. Jones
Defendant:
Dave Yost
3Rd Party Defendant:
Mike DeWine, Natalie Haupt, Kyle L. Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
