Cases 21 - 30 of 3,217
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. Clarkson et al
as 3:2024cv03101
Plaintiff:
Peter Jennings
Defendant:
. Clarkson, . Howard, William Coonrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuck v. Condreva et al
as 1:2024cv03425
Plaintiff:
William Tuck
Defendant:
Condreva, Lammert and Starling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweet v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv03306
Plaintiff:
Derek I. Sweet
Defendant:
Latanya Williams, Lola, Stateville Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Kim et al
as 1:2024cv03310
Plaintiff:
William J. Jenkins
Defendant:
Young Kim, Donna Petrauskis, Wellpath LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Callahan v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03239
Plaintiff:
William M Callahan, II
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Cook County Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Sy et al
as 1:2024cv03213
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Watts
Defendant:
Dr. Larry Sy, Wexford Insurance and Tarry Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuck v. Cook County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv03251
Plaintiff:
William Tuck
Defendant:
Cook County Correctional Facility and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01110
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pierritz, Jr. v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv50137
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Pierritz, Jr.
Defendant:
Tarry Williams, Andrea Tack, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
